Case Study
SPARC
SPARC moved from broadly framed and internally written materials to two audience-specific narratives that made the project easier to champion, support, and implement.

Client
International Organization for Migration (IOM – UN Migration)
Focus
Stakeholder positioning, messaging, and communication structure
Outcome
Two audience-specific versions with clearer messaging and calls to action
Situation
Strong technical work,
weak stakeholder fit
SPARC had developed multiple factsheets and project materials over time. The technical content was strong, but the messaging varied across documents and audiences. Language was internally written, positioning was not always explicit, and staff lacked a concise narrative they could confidently use in donor and internal conversations.
Challenge
The project explained what it was, but not why it mattered to each audience
01
Messaging tried to serve multiple audiences at once, which made the communication feel broad rather than persuasive.
02
Leadership and prospective candidates needed different reasons to engage, but those decision drivers were not clearly defined.
03
Materials described the initiative, but did not make the next step obvious for the people whose support mattered most.
Solution
We rebuilt the story around decision-making
01. Clarified the positioning
We worked with the team to define SPARC's core positioning and identify the two stakeholder audiences most capable of advancing its objectives.
02. Focused the communication
Rather than speaking to everyone at once, we restructured the materials to speak directly to prospective candidates and leadership, each with clearly articulated priorities.
03. Turned fragmented materials into a usable narrative
We consolidated disconnected documents, aligned the language with institutional priorities and donor-facing impact framing, and built clearer calls to action into the communication.
Result
From internally descriptive to audience-aligned
SPARC moved from internally descriptive materials to audience-aligned narratives. Messaging for prospective candidates reflected real career motivations, while leadership materials clarified institutional relevance. The initiative became easier to champion internally and more compelling to engage with.
Before


- Multi-purpose communication
- Mixed messaging across materials
- No clear audience-specific actions
After


- Two audience-specific versions
- Clearer structure and positioning
- Messaging tied to audience priorities and action